Enough! What is happening to Science in America?
I have been listening to a lot of news lately, via Podcasting and iTunes 5. In fact, I almost never listen to music anymore on my daily commute, unless it is lpayed by a podcaster.
Anyway, I listen to ABS nightly news and have other sources such as NPR’s Science Friday. All I have to say is that ABC news sometimes makes me cry. What on earth is happening to my country? For whatever reason, decisions are being made in government with regards to science that defy rational thought. This is not limited to one or two small items, this ranges across all areas of Science, including medicine, and is affecting people’s lives.
Three issues in particular:
1. Teaching Creationism in schools as a scientific theory (WTF!?!)
2. Hindering the study of medical technology from stem cells
3. refusing to realease the Plan B emergency contraceptive as an over the counter drug.
This last one is comparitively small, but I just heard it this morning from ABC news while on the train to Hong Kong. In this case, it is patently clear that the science and medicine backs the release of the drug, a sort of “super pill”, that can greatly help to reduce the possibility of an unwanted pregnancy if taken within hours. However, the pill has been blocked from release over the counter, where it can do the most help (often one is not able to schedule a doctor’s appointment in order to get a prescription in time) due to “political pressure.”
This is so wrong on so many levels I can not even describe how angry and disappointed I am. This decision made by the FDA not only defies logic and their own mandate to protect people’s health, but it also is unconstitutional. The panel of scientists and doctors assigned to evaluate the drug approved it with a vote of 24-4. The drug itself is already available in prescription form, and is proven to be safe and effective. The goal of this drug is to prevent unwanted pregnancy, therefore, logically it should be made available to people why are at risk of unwanted pregnancy. However, despite the proven effectiveness, despite the doctor’s endorsement, the FDA denied the application for OTC status, thereby effectively reducing the effectiveness of the drug, and endangering patient health unnecessarily. Some might argue that pregnancy is not a health risk, but I would counter that in fact it is a serious health risk physically, but more importantly it is a huge psycological threat. If a woman does not wat to give birth, for whatever reason, when she does give birth it creates myriad problems for her, for the child, for society. In many cases, specifically non-concentual sex, having a way to avoid the long term physical effects of the crime must be made availble if it is technologically possible. But the FDA ignors this, ignores the health of the american public, and continues to keep Plan B a presciption-only drug.
To examine the other aspect of my argument, the constitutionality of it, one has to look into the reasons the drug has been withheld. I am not sure why, but on ABC news, no one was willing to take the step and say where this “political pressure” comes from. The pressure can only come from 2 areas, competition, or ideological resistance. As far as I know, Plan B has no competition except for RU485. Now, it is possible that lobbyists from RU485 are pushing hard to make sure that if they can not be sold over-counter, than no one else can. However, I am more willing to bet that this kind of pressure comes from people who have an ideological problem with what Plan B represents. Plan B works by preventing the egg from leaving the ovary, or preventing the eg from embedding itself in the uterine lining. This is the same effect that the normal contraceptive pill has. The difference is that Plan B is taken after intercourse. In some people’s minds, this equates it with Abortion. The topic of abortion, especially at the single-celled stage, is finally a religious issue. Some people believe that abortions are immoral and against the will of God. Therefore, for the US Government to force me (if I were a woman facing an unwanted pregnancy) to allow the a baby to come to term basically amounts to stripping me of my right to religous freedom. I have to follow their religion even if I don’t believe in it. This is unconstitutional.
Granted, calling PlanB abortion is a stretch, but there is an argument that the drug will cause people to treat sex more casually if this emergency contraceptive is available. Still, this idea is not based on science, studies have shown that access to contraceptives does not alter behavior. In addition, this is still an impression of someone’s idea of how a woman should act beign forced upon everyone. And even if we are in agreement that casual sex is not a good thing, we still have the ever-present danger of non-consentual intercourse. Rape. Incest. Pressure from people in power or abusers of trust. What can these victims do if they become pregnant? The fact that someone thinks that the risk of casual sex is greater than the emotional anguish of a rape victim is simply reprehensible.